Star Clusters in spiral galaxies are missing millions of years worth of collisions

Cosmologists who accept the Big Bang model naturally predicted that because spiral galaxies are, allegedly, at least hundreds of millions of years old, therefore the bulge of stars in the center of the spirals would have formed from millions of years of collisions. However, astronomers carefully studying those bulges have found them to exhibit a perfect orderliness. As reported in the New Scientist article, "Galaxies too good to be true," Princeton University cosmologist Jim Peebles added that, "It's really an embarrassment."

Cosmologist John Kormendy admitted that the prinstine bulges, "were something of a shock." For they, "look rather too perfect." The Real Science Friday co-hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams recommend two videos that highlight these kinds of important discoveries. Spike Psarris, formerly with the U.S. military space program, created the greatest astronomy DVDs ever made, Vol. I about our Solar System, and Vol. II about Stars and Galaxies. Also, YoungEarth.com thanks Creation magazine for alerting us to the above spiral galaxy cluster findings. As reported for years on the RSF radio broadcast and podcast, those who believe in materialist origins are forever dismayed, shocked, and even call the latest discoveries "horrendous," because scientific observations typically contradict the fundamental predictions of atheistic origins. (A few examples: Most animals and so many plants reproduce sexually, and "convergence" is everywhere, yet Darwinism would never predict sexual reproduction nor convergence. Also, for decades a major prediction by Darwinists, now falsified, has been that the majority of the human genome would be Junk DNA. In September 2012 a landmark study in the journal Nature contradicted these ubiquitous evolutionary claims reporting that 440 genetic researchers have, so far, identified function in 80% of the human genetic code.)

Here's the Point: Predictions are the stuff of science. And when big-picture predictions are contradicted in an enormous way, as with galaxies-worth of contrary evidence from trillions and trillions of stars, the scientifically-minded student of nature will then reconsider the validity of the original model which led to the predictions.

For more about the wonderful developments from astronomy see Real Science Radio /big-bang for our debate with theoretical physicist (emphasis on the theoretical) Lawrence Krauss.